top of page

Ways Blockchain Can Aid The Effectiveness And Use Of Complementary Currencies

Writer: TLivingstonBlogTLivingstonBlog

Updated: Nov 16, 2021

Note: This is a guest post from Blockchain.works-hub.com.


Currency is nothing more than an intermediary to facilitate the exchange of goods and services. It is a contract between two parties involved in a transaction and this form of contract has evolved over ages. What we know as currency at large is a state-regulated set of denominations. But, the past wasn’t exactly similar as there was a time when humans exchanged goods solely through the barter system. This eventually moved on to gold and silver coins issued by regional rulers, to local banks, and so on.

The system is way past those eras now, what we experience today is a highly complex global economic structure. The interdependence of national economies has created an intertwined system of currencies that are government-issued notes and coins. But to think that nationally issued government currency notes are the only way to exchange value within an economy would be ignorance to a slight extent.

There have always been other means to signify a transfer of goods and value. Complementary currencies have been a part of the US economy way before federal reserve notes came into place. Each region used to maintain its banking system at different times in history to facilitate the community economy. Though, the most relevant complementary currency of our age is a technological behemoth, Bitcoin. Inefficiencies and shortcomings in the nationally accepted systems have led to the invention of bitcoin and the same can be said for any other complementary system in the past.


CRISIS AND CRYPTOCURRENCY


There have been many crisis events in history that have shaped country-wide economics in a variety of ways. While the American Civil War gave rise to the national banking system, the 2008 economic meltdown fueled the cryptocurrency race with the advent of Bitcoin. The former disrupted the regional banks to make a centralized federal banking structure whereas the latter challenges the government’s centralized power over currency. Even though the eras of civil war and the 2008 global recession are highly contrasting, the financial movements that rose from these events challenge the same centralized system that is highly prone to manipulation.


In 2009, the world witnessed the first truly decentralized digital currency in the form of Bitcoin. We also saw the simultaneous invention of Blockchain, the technology that powers Bitcoin and tens of thousands of other cryptocurrencies of today. With this technology, we are creating a parallel currency system that is not governed by borders or central authorities. All of this is possible because blockchain works on the sole idea of decentralization and eliminating intermediaries.


THE NEW AGE OF COMPLEMENTARY CURRENCY


Let us get one thing clear, that Bitcoin, Ethereum, Cardano, or any other crypto coin will not entirely replace fiat currencies and the official banking system, not anytime soon at least. In fact, cryptocurrencies are alternate money systems and are not considered complementary currencies as their multiplier effect isn’t driven by government actions. But there is an enormous growth in blockchain technology job listings around the world, when we look at this along with the fact that many newer cryptocurrencies are close embodiments of community money we can say that the upcoming technology surely promises to revamp the idea of complementary currency.


Complementary money systems furnish community relationships, push regional growth, and create self- sustainability. But they have shortcomings that limit their scope of success.


CONSTRAINTS OF COMPLEMENTARY CURRENCY SYSTEMS (CCS)


CCSs have struggled to be in circulation for a variety of reasons and have failed to serve their purpose in the long term. Community-based local money has been the most prominent form of complementary currency and some of them even had a substantial circulation time. Despite multiple attempts at creating a parallel system of money, there have been only a handful of them that remain active at present.

Ithaca HOURS is an example of one such community currency that was in circulation in Ithaca, New York since 1991. Though it is not in circulation anymore, it was the first legitimate complementary currency in the US and one of the longest-running. Many local businesses and service providers accepted payments in Ithaca Hours, where the value of one Ithaca Hour was pegged to $10, which was the average wage in Ithaca during 1991. Paul Glover was the founder of this system, a community activist, and a professor. His movement began with the noble idea of supporting local business by protecting it from the Dollar’s volatility and the idea had its momentum until Glover got more involved in his political career.


What happened with HOURS was not unique. LETs was another community currency, used in adjunction to the Canadian Dollar in British Columbia. The exchange system was invented by a Dentist, named Micheal Linton and his system failed when he moved away. The loss of active leadership has been a major reason for the failure of many community currencies.

Another major constraint with CCSs is the lack of scalable models. Capitalism works on value creation and the conventional banking system is foundational to it. Historically, complementary currencies and local banks have failed to create that value generation chain. For such alternate money systems to work, community currencies must reduce people’s dependence on official money and banking system. There is another set of such currencies that took birth in the post-2008 era but couldn’t survive the massive digitization of the banking and payments systems.

With this, we can comprehend that there are three major constraints with complementary currencies;

  1. Community Leadership, centralization

  2. Lack of robust financial model

  3. Technological hindrance


Thankfully, blockchain was designed to tackle all these bottle-neck issues. The first Bitcoin paper was focused on the decentralization of money and value creation. It has a model that makes it highly relevant in today’s world despite the enormous backlash and even bans in several countries. Today there are numerous blockchain-based currencies in the market and on crypto exchange platforms.


BLOCKCHAIN TO AID COMPLEMENTARY CURRENCY


Blockchain programs use a decentralized ledger to record data secured by modern cryptography. The changes in these ledgers are verified by a network of unacquainted peers through an algorithmic consensus. This makes the ledger highly secure, immutable, and practically incorruptible.


Bitcoin was the first product/idea to use Blockchain in practicality and through years of evolutions, it has eliminated many problems that our government-backed currency faces, like centralized control. This is an issue with complementary currencies as well. No matter how noble an idea is, the fact that there is a need for active leadership makes its fate concentrated in one place. When we look at community banking in blockchain led systems, we are looking at opportunities to create an ecosystem that will make these banks and local currencies into sustainable entities.


Brixton Pound is one such complementary/community currency that has realized the need to generate value and provide an actual alternative to the Pound Sterling. Launched in 2008, Brixton Pound was one of the first local currencies to adopt digital payments but their model was not sustainable. That is why, in 2021, they are bringing a new iteration that is based on Algorand’s proof-of-stake blockchain program.


FUTURE OF COMMUNITY AND COMPLEMENTARY CURRENCIES


The worldwide acceptance of cryptocurrency is proof that the global citizen is ready to accept currency in more than one form. And the reason why crypto coins like Bitcoin and Ethereum are so valuable is that they have a unique value creation model that works in tandem with our capitalistic system. This is one thing that almost all complementary currencies until now have had missing.

The fact that many cryptocurrencies will transform into community money in the future, makes a solid case for blockchain to make complementary currencies more effective in the coming times.



Disclaimer: This information is issued solely for informational and educational purposes and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy securities. None of the information contained in this post constitutes a recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction, or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. From time to time, the content creator or its affiliates may hold positions or other interests in securities mentioned in this blog or the associated Twitter and Instagram feeds. The stock or stocks presented are not to be considered a recommendation to buy any stock or stocks. This material does not take into account your particular investment objectives. Investors should consult their own financial or investment adviser before trading or acting upon any information provided. Past performance is not indicative of future results.


Comments


Commenting has been turned off.

Statement on Accessibility

We are working to make this website easier to access for people with disabilities, and will follow the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0. ​ If you need assistance with a particular page or document on our current site, please contact tlivingstonblog@gmail.com to request assistance.

Join My Mailing List

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Crypto CFTC advisories

bottom of page